The Supreme Court of Nigeria on Tuesday, reserved judgment in a suit filed by Osun state government seeking to restrain the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) from releasing the withheld Local Government funds to the disputed Local Government chairmen elected on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC).
Justice Uwani Aba’aji reserved judgement after taking arguments from Musbau Adetumbi, SAN who represented Osun state Attorney General and Chief Akin Olujimi, SAN who stood for the AGF.
Justice Aba’aji, who led a 7- man panel of Justices in the Tuesday’s proceedings announced that the date for judgement delivery in the suit with Number, SC/CV/773/2025 would be communicated to the two parties when it is ready.
In the suit, the Osun Attorney General sought order of the apex court directing the AGF to immediately release the statutory allocations to Chairmen and Councilors validly elected for the 30 Local Government Areas of the Osun state.
Besides, the plaintiff who invoked Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction based on a letter by AGF according recognition to the disputed APC Chairmen, also sought an order stopping the AGF from further withholding, suspending or seizing monthly allocations and revenues standing to the credit of the Constituents Local Governments, having democratically elected Chairmen in place.
The grouse of the Osun Attorney General was that, the AGF was wrong in his letter recognizing APC Local Government chairmen when the matter was pending before court of records.
He also predicated his case on the ground that the election that brought in the APC officials as Local Government chairmen and Councillors had been nullified by a Federal High Court and upheld by the Court of Appeal in Abuja.
Adetumbi, while presenting the case of the plaintiff, pleaded with the seven Justices to uphold his arguments and grant all the reliefs sought by his client.
However, in opposition, the AGF represented by Akin Olujimi SAN argued a preliminary objection where he urged the apex court to dismiss the case of the plaintiff on various grounds.
Among others, the Olujimi argued that the plaintiff lacked locus standing (Legal power) to bring the case before the Supreme Court to invoke the original jurisdiction because the matter is between two political parties.
He also contended that the apex court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit because the suit was not competent to be presented directly to the apex court as done by the plaintiff.
The senior lawyer argued that, the suit did not disclose any cause of action adding that, the tenure of the disputed council chairmen is still running till October 22 and that, the proper thing was for the statutory allocation to be be released to them to run the Councils.
Similarly, he argued that Osun state Attorney General had engaged in abuse of court processes by filing cases in about seven high courts on the same subject with the same parties.
He therefore urged the court to refuse granting reliefs sought by the plaintiff and dismiss the suit in its entirety.